Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3632 of 2025 Date of decision: 17.03.2025 Pankaj Parmar.
...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
...Respondents.
Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Ajeet Singh Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner’s case is that he is serving as Lecturer (Chemistry) at Government Senior Secondary School, Malal, District Chamba, which according to him falls under hard area under the applicable policy guidelines. On completion of prescribed tenure at the aforesaid areas, he had preferred a representation on 03.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.2 seeking transfer to a soft area of his choice. Petitioner’s 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
-2- grievance is that aforesaid representation has not been decided by respondent No.2/competent authority till date.
3. Looking to the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, it would in the interest of justice to direct respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable policy within a period of four weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The
order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 17th March, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)