Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90018 (ALL)

VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/29674/2025 · 2025-09-03

Gautam Chowdhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29674 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Sri V.,K.Singh and Sri Narayan Swaroop, learned counsel have filed their power on behalf of the informant today in the Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn attention of this Court to the statement of injured and argued that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. He further submits that the author of the injury is not known however, general role has been assigned to all the accused persons including the applicant. It is thus contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 10.07.2025. 4. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that in case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar Maheshwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vipin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) application stands allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vipin Kumar be released on bail in Case Crime No. 0069 of 2025 under Section 110, 351(3), 3(5) of B.N.S. Police Station Sikhera, District Muzaffar Nagar, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in accordance with law. September 4, 2025 S.Ali BAIL No. 29674 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad