-1- 2025:CGHC:19015 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1865 of 2018 Vasudev Katholiya S/o Nandaram Sonkar Aged About 63 Years R/o Sonkar Para Near Sarvajanik Shitla Mandir Ward No. 48 , Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director , Directorate of Urban Administration And Development New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Joint Director Urban Administration And Development Regional officer Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pension Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Vidyabhushan Soni, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. B. P. Singh, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28.04.2025 -2- 1) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 07.02.2018 (Annexure P/1) and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities for reconsidering the case of petitioner for grant of pensionary benefits. 10.2 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given.” 2) Mr. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.5 submits that the department has already finalized the pension case of the petitioner and pursuant to order dated 05.12.2020, the petitioner is receiving pension every month. He has placed a copy of final order dated 05.12.2020 on record during the course of arguments. 3) Mr. Soni, learned counsel, endorses the submission made by Mr. Sharma. 4) Taking into consideration the fact that the pension case of the petitioner has already been finalized, at this stage, the present writ petition is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to revive his prayer, if cause of action still subsists. 5) The documents produced by Mr. Sharma shall be part of the record. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM