Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112393 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28654 of 2024 Applicant :- Ram Naresh @ Nabi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Singh Sengar,Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ramendra Singh,G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the Charge sheet dated 12.01.2023; cognizance order dated 19.05.2023 as well as entire proceeding of Case No.3512/2023 (State Versus Ram Naresh @ Nabi), Case Crime No.321/2022, Under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Fafoond, District Auraiya on the basis of compromise. 3. As per prosecution version, applicant by committing fraud, received money from informant for providing job in Police department. Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant filed 482 Application before this Court to quash the proceedings as both the parties have amicably settled the dispute out of the court. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.01.2025 and 01.07.2025 directed the parties to appear before the court below for verification of compromise. 4. Pursuant to the said order dated 01.07.2025, the parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the contents of the compromise made between the parties, the court vide order dated 03.07.2025 has passed the verification report.Thereafter a letter has been transmitted to this Court by the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.). A copy of the same is annexed with the application. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that opposite party no. 2 has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Case No.3512/2023 (State Versus Ram Naresh @ Nabi), Case Crime No.321/2022, Under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Fafoond, District Auraiya, is hereby quashed. 9. The application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad