HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33001 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner firm is registered supplier of I.S.I. market P.V.C. pipes etc. to the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam, Varanasi and there is an agreement between the petitioner and respondent Jal Nigam. 3. The Material Manager, Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam, Lucknow issued a letter dated 22.12.2016 in favour of the petitioner's firm with subject "Allocation of I.S.I. Market P.V.C. Pipes against the contract Bond No.01/MM/2016-16, dated 13.04.2016. In pursuance of the same, petitioner's firm supplied the P.V.C. Pipes etc. to the respondent Jal Nigam, and total payment of which is Rs.9,39,146/- (as invoice No.512 Rs.4,69,573/- dated 06.06.2019, invoice No.666 Rs.4,69,573/- dated 20.06.2019). 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner's firm aforesaid bill of Rs.9,39,146/- (as invoice No.512 Rs.4,69,573/- dated 06.06.2019, invoice No.666 Rs.4,69,573/- dated 20.06.2019) has not been paid to the petitioner by the respondent Jal Nigam. The petitioner in this respect has given several representations to the respondent concerned, but no heed has been paid on the same. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 6. In such view of the fact, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjay Kumar Om, Suresh Singh M/S Mahavir Palyplast Private Limited .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) the respondent no.3-Chief Engineer (Gramin), Construction Department, District Varanasi along with a certified copy of this order, raising all its grievances within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously preferably within a period of two months thereafter after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. September 19, 2025 NS WRIC No. 33001 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad