Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89991 (ALL)

THAKUR RAMVIR SINGH PUNDEER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/7321/2025 · 2025-09-08

Vivek Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7321 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. This application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 245C of 2012 under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 328, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District- Saharanpur. 2. At the outset, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State submits that the applicant had earlier preferred an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 27785 of 2017 (Thakur Ramveer Singh Pundir and 3 others vs. State of U.P. and another) for quashing the cognizance and summoning order dated 17.09.2016 as well as the proceedings of the aforementioned case. The said application was disposed of vide order dated 01.09.2017 with a direction that in the event the applicant appears through counsel before the court concerned within three weeks, his personal appearance shall stand exempted, except on the date, on which charge, is to be framed or any other date on which the court concerned directs the applicant to ensure his personal physical presence. However, in the event, the court concerned finds that the applicant is dilly dallying the disposal of the complaint, it shall be at liberty to take recourse to such coercive measure as are available under law. Learned AGA further submits that the said fact has not been disclosed in the present Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pratibha Ojha, Rajiv Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Thakur Ramvir Singh Pundeer .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) application.The present application is liable to be dismissed on this ground alone. 3. At this stage, Sri Rajiv Shukla, counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of the present application. 4. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. September 9, 2025 Lbm/- NABAIL No. 7321 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad