RSA-14-201 IN THE HIG 110 S. Gurdev Si Shri Jagat Bh CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP plaintiff/app the Courts permanent i Courts below issued in the listed for he 26.03.2019, 10.10.2023, which on 0 appellants h hearing, the appellants on 2017(O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o dev Singh and another Versus Bhushan M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Manish Joshi, Advocate for Mr. Karanjit Singh, Advocate fo I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present regular second app /appellants against the concurrent ju ourts below whereby the suit for nent injunction filed by the plaintiff below. The matter pertains to the year in the same. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) sho for hearing as many as 12 times i.e. 2019, 18.07.2019, 06.02.2020, 2023, 09.02.2024, 21.05.2024, 28.10.2 on 03 dates i.e. on 18.09.2023, 28.0 ants had gone un-represented; and g, the case was adjourned at the reque ants on the one pretext or the other. F ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-14-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.02.2025 .… Appellants .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ate for cate for the appellants. nd appeal has been preferred by the rent judgments and decrees of both it for declaration, possession and aintiffs was dismissed by both the ar 2017 and notice is yet to be t(s) shows that this appeal has been i.e. on 14.09.2018, 15.03.2019, 020, 18.09.2023, 28.09.2023, 28.10.2024 and 30.01.2025; out of 3, 28.09.2023 and 28.10.2024, the and on the remaining dates of request of learned counsel for the ther. Further, perusal of the order- the both and the RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.11 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-14-201 sheets revea it was infor pendency of time for brin 30.01.2025, implead the for the appel have exhibit litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Thus, this Co non-prosecu 11.02.2025 rishu 2017(O&M) -2- reveals that on 21.05.2024, when this informed by learned counsel for th ncy of instant appeal, the appellants h or bringing on record their LRs. On 2025, learned counsel for the appella d the LRs of the deceased-appellants. appellants again seeks time to do the A bare reading of the above fa exhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th casual and careless approach. It is cl eir counsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other option e rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable en this case was listed for hearing, for the appellants that during the lants have expired and had sought s. On the last date of hearing i.e. ppellants had sought more time to llants. Today also, learned counsel o the needful. ove facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. ption except to dismiss the same for any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ants sent the ts in d an ants tter. for RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.11 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.