CRWP-8662 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 134 SADAM STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions to the petitioners 2. the petitioners have filed a representation dated before the counsel prays for directions to abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. 8662-2025 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Waqar Ahmed Khurshid SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 the petitioners from the respondents No.4 The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, counsel prays for directions to the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 3 only 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8662-2025 DECIDED ON: 11.08.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH Waqar Ahmed Khurshid, Advocate for the petitioners. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo 2 and 3 to provide adequate protection to respondents No.4 and 5. earned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 19.07.2025 (Annexure P Superintendent of Police, Nuh. The learned the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. respondents No.1 to 3 only. .2025 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for provide adequate protection to earned counsel representing the petitioners submits that 2025 (Annexure P-3) earned respondent No.2 to decide the GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.12 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8662 5. disposing of the representation (Annexure P No.2 and 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to representation (Annexure P receipt of copy of instant order 7. adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners. The police authority of District liberty to make the petitioners security to the petitioners. Gaurav Thakur Whether Whether reportable 8662-2025 8587 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for disposing of the representation (Annexure P No.2 and that the instant writ petition be disposed of. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the representation (Annexure P-3) within a period of 15 days from of copy of instant order, by passing a speaking order. It is further directed that the petitioners adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners. The police authority of District rty to make independent assessment with regard to threat perception the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of security to the petitioners. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for disposing of the representation (Annexure P-3) be given to the respondent writ petition be disposed of. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is the respondent No.2 to decide the ) within a period of 15 days from the date of , by passing a speaking order. directed that the petitioners shall be provided adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners. The police authority of District Nuh shall be at assessment with regard to threat perception on the issue of providing adequate :Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for respondent Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is respondent No.2 to decide the the date of be provided adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat shall be at assessment with regard to threat perception to providing adequate GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.12 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document