MANOHAR LAL DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS v. SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER AND OTHERS
LPA/162/2025 · 2025-09-10
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89973 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89973 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
LPA-162-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
110 LPA-162-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision :10.09.2025 Manohar Lal (now deceased) through LRs .. Appellants and others
Versus Superintending Canal Officer and others ...Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Judgepreet Singh Warring, Advocate for the appellants. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 18.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP-8354- 2019 by which, prayer of the appellants herein for setting aside the order dated 03.07.2018 passed by Superintending Canal Officer as well as orders dated 31.10.2000/21.11.2000 passed by Divisional Canal Officer, has been rejected.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to approach the authorities concerned again in view of the amendment brought into effect in the year 2017 (Annexure A- 1).
AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.11 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
LPA-162-2025 (O&M) -2-
3. Ordered accordingly.
4. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
(VIKAS SURI) September 10, 2025 JUDGE
aarti Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.11 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document