DEEPAK KUMAR S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2954/2025 · 2025-03-03
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8997 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8997 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9593] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2954/2025 Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Nathawala, Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur. (Currently In Central Jail, Jaipur, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemang Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 03/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.37/2025 registered at Police Station Shahpura (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 331(6), 115(2) & 305(a) of BNS. Investigation is being conducted for offences punishable under Sections 331(6), 115(2), 309(6) & 305(a) of BNS.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 05.02.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion.
[2025:RJ-JP:9593] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2954/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; petitioner has no criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in every three months in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the
[2025:RJ-JP:9593] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2954/2025] petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /398