Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89963 (PNJ)

M/S MOHIT CONFECTIONARY (P) LTD v. HARYANA URBAN DEV. AUTHORITY & ANR

RSA/419/2014 · 2025-01-10

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA No.419 of 2014 IN TH 161 M/S MOHIT CO Vs HARYANA URB CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. V for th Mr. P Ms. K HARKESH MAN CM No.12764-C By w has been made fo already been fixed Notic Lear no objection qua t Upon mentioned in the case is preponed a RSA-419-2014 On 0 14 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CM No.12 RSA No.41 Decision: IT CONFECTIONARY (P) LTD URBAN DEV. AUTHORITY & A ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate wi Ms. Kanchan Sindhu, Advocate for th **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) C of 2024 By way of present application filed ade for preponement of date of hear n fixed for 20.02.2025. Notice in the application. Learned counsel representing the re n qua the prayer made in the applicatio Upon hearing learned counsel for in the application, the same is allowed oned and the matter is taken up today (O&M) On 06.07.2022 this Court passed the UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.12764-C of 2024 in/and No.419 of 2014 (O&M) Date of sion: 10.01.2025 ......Appellant Y & ANR ....Respondent( ESH MANUJA with for the respondents. n filed under Section 151 CPC, pray f hearing of the main case, which ha the respondents accepts notice and ha lication. el for the parties and for the reason llowed. The date of hearing of the ma today itself. ed the following order:- 1 (s) , prayer ich has and has reasons he main MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.14 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment RSA No.419 of 2014 conn heard sched reque matte revisi appe respo beco prop Lear appellant has rem judgment and dec his favour within In vi has been rendered Dism Pend January 10, 202 Atik Whe Whe 14 (O&M) “Leaned counsel for both the pa onnected matter bearing CR No.1315 eard along-with the present matter v scheduled to be listed for hearing befor equest for taking up the present appe atter. Accordingly, the present appeal evision petition on the date as already At this stage, learned counsel ppellant has already removed the espondent-Department to be unauthor ecome infructuous. However, learned counsel for th roper instructions in this regard from Learned counsel representing the as removed the unauthorized part of c nd decree passed by the Trial Court, ithin a period of two months from tod In view of aforesaid stand taken by th ndered infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructu ending application(s), if any, shall , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N e parties jointly apprise the Court that 1315 of 2014, which was ordered to ter vide order dated 03.03.2014, is no efore this Court on 05.08.2022 and th appeal along- -with the said connect peal be listed along-with the above-sa ady fixed therein, i.e. 05.08.2022. nsel for the appellant submits that the construction as termed by t uthorized and therefore, this appeal h r the respondents seeks some time to g rom the quarter concerned.” g the respondents confirms that th rt of construction and, thus, in terms o ourt, the allotment shall be restored om today. n by the respondents, the present appe nfructuous. shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 that a to be is now d they nected said the y the al has to get that the terms of tored in appeal MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.14 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment