Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84725 Court No. - 85 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4355 of 2024 Revisionist :- Vishal Sonkar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Jitendra Nath Tiwari,Prabhat Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amitabh Tripathi,G.A.,Vishvanath Prasad Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Case is taken up in the revised call. 2. None present for the applicant to press the revision. 3. Sri Amitabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is present and submits that the revision has rendered infructuous in view of certain subsequent developments. 4. Elaborating his submissions, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that by the order impugned, the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the recall application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. was allowed subject to payment of Rs.28,000/- as cost. On one hand, the applicant challenged the said order before this Court by filing instant revision, on the other, an application seeking extension of time to deposit the same was moved before the Family Court itself. The Family Court granted further time pursuant whereto, the same has been deposited by the applicant and, therefore, now application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. has to be considered on merits and the same is pending. 5. Copy of the application seeking extension of time as well as tender demonstrating the deposit of Rs.28,000/- has been produced before this Court and are taken on record. 6. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the instant revision has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 P Kesari Digitally signed by :- PRACHI KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRACHI KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad