Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8995 (AP)

KUNA HEMANTH KUMAR v. KUNA LAVANYA

CRP/658/2020 · 2025-07-03

T C D Sekhar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010098192020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 658/2020 Between: 1. KUNA HEMANTH KUMAR, S/O K. SANYASI RAO, AGED 31 YRS PROJECT ENGINEER, FEA STRUCTURAL AT DINEX DENMARK, REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER (PERMITTED AS PER ORDERS IN I.A. 10/2018) KUNA SANYASI RAO S/O KURMINAIDU, AGED 58 YRS VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. KUNA LAVANYA, W/O KUNA HEMANTH KUMAR AGED 26 YRS, D.NO.1-158 , P.D,N.PARADESIE PILAKAVANIPALEM, MADHURUVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. KUNA LOHITH KUMAR, S/O KUNA HEMANTH KUMAR AGED 2 YRS ,MINOR , REPRESENTED BY 2ND PETITIONER WHO IS THE MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN I.., KUNA LAVANYA W/O K. HEMANTH KUMAR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an Order to Set-Aside the impugned Order passed in I.A.NO. 724/2019 In FCOP 968/2017 dated 11.02.2020 on the file of FAMILY COURT VISAKHAPATNAM, against the Petitioner/Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.NO.658 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the order dared 11-02- 2020 passed in I.A.No.724/2019 in FCOP 968/2017 on the file of the Family Court cum V Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam in filing the above CRP otherwise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and hardship and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay of all the further proceedings in FCOP 968/2017 on the file of the Family Court cum V Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam in filing the above CRP otherwise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and hardship and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following ORDER:- It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present civil revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR 04.07.2025. LSP 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.NO.658 OF 2020 40 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 658/2020 04.07.2025 LSP