Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53132 WP No. 12919 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 12919 OF 2017 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI T R VISHWANATH, S/O RAMACHANDRA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT THAMBIHALLI VILLAGE, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR TQ. KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.N.VISWANATHA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REPTD. BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR BEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 121.
3.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, KOLAR SUB DIVISION, KOLAR DIST., KOLAR - 563 121.
4.
THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR, NADAKACHERI, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR TQ. - 563 121. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53132 WP No. 12919 of 2017
5.
SRI T N SUDHEENDRA RAO, S/O NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT THAMBIHALLI VILLAGE, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUQ - 563 121.
6.
SRI T N RAGHAVENDRA, S/O NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT THAMBIHALLI VILLAGE, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR TQ. - 563 121. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA.K.S., AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI. ABHINAY Y.J., ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 23.11.2016 PASSED IN R.A.53/2016-17 ON THE FILE OF R-2 VIDE ANNEX-H; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53132 WP No. 12919 of 2017
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the respective parties have filed a joint memo stating that the dispute is amicably settled between the parties. Accordingly, they pray to dispose of this petition in terms of the joint memo.
2. The joint memo reads as follows: The petitioner, respondent No.5 and 6 humbly submits that, their dispute in respect of the property in question is settled outside the Court. In view of the settlement order dated 23.11.2016 in RA No.53/2016-2017 on the file of the 2nd respondent (ANNEXURE-H) may be set aside and revenue entry may be continued in the name of the Petitioner, pursuant to the order dated 07.06.2016 passed in RA No.164/2013- 2014 on the file of the 3rd Respondent (ANNEXURE-G) and the above Writ Petition may be disposed off in terms of this Joint Memo, in the interest of justice and equity.
3. The respective parties are present before the Court. As a token of settlement, parties have affixed their signatures.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53132 WP No. 12919 of 2017
Placing reliance on the memo, Writ Petition is
disposed of in terms of the joint memo.
In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the order dated 23.11.2016 passed by respondent No.2 in RA No.53/2016-17 is quashed. Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29