Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89943 (MAD)

S.Purushothaman v. Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/24671/2025 · 2025-10-08

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 24671 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR CRL OP No. 24671 of 2025 S.Purushothaman S/o.Subramani, No.13/25, Manikka Chetti Street, Choolai, Chennai-600 007. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Inspector of Police, G1, Vepperi Police Station, Chennai-60 0007. 2. Sankar Respondent(s) Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records and quash the proceedings in FIR No.359 of 2025 against the petitioner on the file of G1, Vepperi Police Station, Chennai. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24671 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Chithradevi For Respondent: Mr. K.M.D.Muhilan, Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in the FIR in Crime No.359 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 309(6)and 351(3) of the BNS. 2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner along with one Immanuel, waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.500/- at knife point. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has no connection whatsoever with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24671 of 2025 4. It is further submitted that the petitioner's son is a doctor and another is an advocate. The charge against the petitioner that he waylaid the defacto complainant is an afterthought and allegations have been falsely foisted against him. Since the local police had demanded some amount from the petitioner's shop and the same was refused the present case has been foisted with malafide intention. 5. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent. 6. On perusal of the First Information Report, it is seen that the defacto complainant has specifically mentioned the name of the petitioner. To unearth the truth, this Court is of the view that the investigation has to be conducted by an officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24671 of 2025 7. Hence, let the first respondent/ Inspector of Police, G1, Vepery Police Station and the Deputy Commissioner of Police shall conduct the investigation and file a final report. 8. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 08-10-2025 2/2 Neutral Citation:Yes/No mrp To The Inspector of Police, G1, Vepperi Police Station, Chennai-60 0007. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24671 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR J. mrp CRL OP No. 24671 of 2025 2/2 08-10-2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis