Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89940 (PNJ)

HARPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8655/2025 · 2025-08-11

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8655 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 133 HARPREET KAUR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions to the petitioners 2. the petitioners have filed a representation dated before the learned counsel prays for directions to abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. 8655-2025 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH HARPREET KAUR & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Ms. Divya Narula, Advocate for the petitioner SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 the petitioners from the respondent No.4. The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated the respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, earned counsel prays for directions to the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 3 only 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8655-2025 DECIDED ON: 11.08.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo 2 and 3 to provide adequate protection to earned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 07.08.2025 (Annexure P Superintendent of Police, Mansa. The the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. respondents No.1 to 3 only. .2025 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for provide adequate protection to earned counsel representing the petitioners submits that 2025 (Annexure P-3) The respondent No.2 to decide the GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.12 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8655 5. disposing of the representation (Annexure P No.2 and 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to representation (Annexure P receipt of 7. adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners. The police authority of District at liberty to make the petitioners security to the petitioners. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 8655-2025 8587 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for disposing of the representation (Annexure P No.2 and that the instant writ petition be disposed of. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the representation (Annexure P-3) within a period of 15 days from receipt of copy of instant order, by passing a speaking order. It is further directed that the petitioners adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat ception to the petitioners. The police authority of District at liberty to make independent assessment with regard to threat perception the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of security to the petitioners. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for disposing of the representation (Annexure P-3) be given to the respondent the instant writ petition be disposed of. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is the respondent No.2 to decide the ) within a period of 15 days from the date of passing a speaking order. directed that the petitioners shall be provided adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat ception to the petitioners. The police authority of District Mansa shall be assessment with regard to threat perception on the issue of providing adequate :Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for respondent Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is respondent No.2 to decide the the date of be provided adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat shall be assessment with regard to threat perception to providing adequate GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.12 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document