- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51627 CRL.A No. 2310 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2310 OF 2025 (C) BETWEEN: SMT. B.T. SRIDEVI W/O SRI. RAVISHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO. 101, ORCHID BLOCK ESTEEM GARDENIA, SAHAKARANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 092. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S. MANOJ KUMAR.,ADVOCATE)(ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. B.N. NAGARAJAIAH S/O NANJAPPA Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51627 CRL.A No. 2310 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO. 621, A BLOCK, 20TH CROSS, 19TH MAIN, SAHAKARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 092. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A FILED U/S 374(2) CR.P.C (U/S 415 BNSS, 2023) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 09.10.2024 IN CC.NO.3282/2021 PASSED BY THE XVIII ACJM, BENGALURU CITY AND THE CONFIRMING JUDGEMENT DATED 03.10.2025 IN CRL.A.NO.559/2025 PASSED BY THE LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-60) BENGALURU CITY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51627 CRL.A No. 2310 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Case called out. Appellant’s counsel absent. 2. Perused the office objection. 3. This appeal is preferred against the complainant/ respondent against the judgment of conviction and order on sentence passed by the XVIII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru in C.C.No.3282/2021 dated 09.10.2024, which is confirmed by the XV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in Crl.A.No.559/2025 dated 03.10.2025. Hence, this appeal is not maintainable. 4. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following: ORDER i) Appeal is dismissed. ii) However, the liberty is given to the appellant to take appropriate legal proceedings in accordance with law. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51627 CRL.A No. 2310 of 2025 iii) Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents produced by the learned counsel for the appellant. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending IA does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE UN, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10