Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89910 (ALL)

SANTOSH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/30732/2025 · 2025-10-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30732 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the transformer has been installed on the land of the petitioner. The petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ-C No.- 3049 of 2025 (Santosh Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and three others), which was dipsosed of by this Court vide judgment dated 03.03.2025 directing the respondent no.4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 3. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the respondent no.4 has passed an order dated 21.04.2025, whereby he has asked the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3,66,430/- for shifting of transformer. 4. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner that the respondent no.4 has wrongly calculated the estimate charge and processing fees and, therefore, it needs to be revised. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent would contend that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well looked into by the competent authority, if the petitioner approaches the competent authority. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.4/ Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division-II, PVVNL, District- Varanasi, within a period of one month from today against the demand of Rs.3,66,430/- for shifting of transformer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Udit Chandra Santosh Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.4/ Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division-II, PVVNL, District- Varanasi shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. October 9, 2025 Virendra WRIC No. 30732 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad