IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 297 of 2016 Date of decision:9th May, 2025 Kuljeet Kaur …Petitioner Versus Kahan Singh …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Appellant: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate vice Mr.Bhagwati Chander Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr.Janesh Gupta, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, under instructions of learned original counsel Mr. Bhagwati Chander Verma, Advocate, submits that despite repeated efforts, appellants are not coming forward to impart instructions and therefore, for want of instructions, learned counsel representing them is not able to contest the matter on their behalf. 2 From above submissions, it appears that appellants are not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. 9th May, 2025 (MS)