ISHFAQ AHMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)
HCP/61/2025 · 2026-05-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 899 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 899 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 27 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR HCP No. 61/2025 Ishfaq Ahmad Mir …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. UT of JK and Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Haris Khan, AC, vice Mr. Mohsin Qadiri, Sr. AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 21.05.2026
01. Learned counsel for the respondents that the instant petition with the efflux of time is rendered infructuous as the detention period of the detenue has since expired and he has been released from the preventive custody. Statement of learned counsel is taken on record.
02. In the aforesaid backdrop, the instant petition is
disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 21.05.2026
“Shamim Dar”