- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45963 CRP No. 272 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 272 OF 2023 (IO-) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MALLAJAMMA W/O. LATE SIDDASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI. MAHADEVASHETTY S/O. LATE SIDDASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SRI. SIDDARAJU S/O. LATE SIDDASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 4. SRI. NINGARAJU S/O. LATE SIDDASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NEW UPPARA STREET, KESTUR VILLAGE, YELANDUR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISRICT - 571 441. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NANJUNDASWAMY N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. MAHADEVASWAMY Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45963 CRP No. 272 of 2023 S/O. LATE MAHADEVA SHETTY, 2. SRI. RAGHU S/O. LATE MAHADEVA SHETTY, 3. SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR S/O. LATE MAHADEVA SHETTY, PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 R/AT NEW UPPARA STREET, KESTUR VILLAGE, YELANDUR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISRICT - 571 441. 4. SMT. PUTTASIDDAMMA W/O. LATE RAMASHETTY, MAJOR, 5. SRI. SHIVANNA S/O. LATE RAMASHETTY, MAJOR, RESPONDENT NO.4 AND 5 ARE R/AT NEW UPPARA STREET, KESTUR VILLAGE, YELANDUR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISRICT - 571 441. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RENSPRE PRITHESH DSOUZA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.12.2022 PASSED ON IA NO.27 IN OS NO.38/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45963 CRP No. 272 of 2023 YELANDUR DISMISSING IA NO. XXVII FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri Nanjundaswamy N. learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Renspre Prithesh D'souza, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that after the filing of the present revision petition, in the trial Court the matter proceeded and on 04.11.2025 arguments on the main suit itself was addressed. 3. Taking note of the said submission, this Court is of the opinion that the relief sought in the present revision petition has rendered infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the following: ORDER i. The revision petition stands dismissed. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45963 CRP No. 272 of 2023 ii. However, if any adverse order is passed in the suit, the defendants are at liberty to canvass as an additional ground in the appeal. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51