M/S ARORA BUILDERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/29544/2025 · 2025-09-03
Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29544 of 2025
(Sl. No. 4) Court No. - 29
HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard Sri Siddhartha Srivastav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Ms. Anjali Upadhay, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Authority.
2. The instant writ petition is preferred for a direction commanding the respondents to ensure payment of the work which has been carried out as per the work order dated 21.8.2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was awarded the work contract regarding capacity maintenance and repair work of 2000 KL over head tank campus, Block-B, Sector-2, Greater Noida vide work order dated 21.8.2023. The petitioner had carried out the work with utmost satisfaction but till date the amount in lieu of the work order has not been released by the Authority. Reliance has also been placed on the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Surya Construction vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2019) 16 SCC 794.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his relief that the application of the petitioner may be decided in accordance with law.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, we dispose of this writ petition with observation that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddhartha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. M/S Arora Builders A Partnership Firm .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
ventilating his grievances before the authority concerned within two weeks, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law and in the light of the judgement in Surya Construction (supra) expeditiously, preferably within next three months.
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)
September 4, 2025 Kirti WRIC No. 29544 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad