HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29810 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Aalok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Ashish Kumar Gautam, holding brief of Shri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents has raised a preliminary objection that for execution of the award, the petitioners have an efficacious statutory remedy by filing an application under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It has thus been submitted that the present writ petition is not maintainable in view of the availability of an alternative remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid legal position. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of an alternative and efficacious remedy, with liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent court in accordance with law under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. October 6, 2025 Sumaira Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aalok Singh, Bheem Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) M/S Ravindra And Company And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad