Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89882 (PNJ)

GURMEET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRA-S/2458/2025 · 2025-08-18

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRA-S-2458 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Gurmeet Singh The State of CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: - NAMIT KUMAR, J. 1. order was passed: 2458 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-2458 Date of decision Gurmeet Singh Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing i.e. 11.08.2025 the following passed: - “The appellant has filed the instant appeal impugning the order dated 09.01.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, application filed by the appellant under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.19 dated 15.02.2024 registered under Sections 363, 366 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station Division No.5, Jalandhar, has been dismissed. On receipt of advance copy of the appeal, Mr. Adhiraj Singh, A.A.G., Punjab has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1-State and has produced copy of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2458 of 2025 Date of decision: 18.08.2025 ......Appellant ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab. On the last date of hearing i.e. 11.08.2025 the following The appellant has filed the instant appeal order dated 09.01.2025 passed by learned Jalandhar, whereby an application filed by the appellant under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking grant anticipatory bail in case FIR No.19 dated 15.02.2024 Sections 363, 366-A, 376 & 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(2)V & 3(2)V(A) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Police Station Division No.5, Jalandhar, has been dismissed. On receipt of advance copy of the appeal, Mr. Singh, A.A.G., Punjab has put in appearance on State and has produced copy of RAVINDER SINGH 2025.08.18 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-S-2458 2. wishes to withdraw the present appeal to challenge the order dated 01.08.2025, passed b (POCSO), Jalandhar. 3. 18.08.2025 R.S. 2458 of 2025 order dated 08.08.2025 passed by Sessions Judge-cum-FTC(POCSO), Jalandhar, has been recorded that the petitioner has been declared as proclaimed offender vide order dated 01.08.2025 and therefore, the instant appeal is not maintainable. Faced with this situation appellant seeks an adjournment to get instructions. Adjourned to 18.08.2025. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the present appeal to challenge the order dated 01.08.2025, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Jalandhar. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 2 order dated 08.08.2025 passed by learned Additional FTC(POCSO), Jalandhar, wherein it has been recorded that the petitioner has been declared as proclaimed offender vide order dated 01.08.2025 and instant appeal is not maintainable. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the seeks an adjournment to get instructions. Adjourned to 18.08.2025.” Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the present appeal to challenge the order dated y learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-FTC Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2025.08.18 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document