Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30616 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for the Saharanpur Development Authority.
2. After the matter has been heard at some length and the Court has proceeded to indicate its mind in negative, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he does not intend to press the present writ petition.
3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 11, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Prakash Paul, Ashish Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Sundar Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad