[2025:RJ-JP:19975] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6205/2025 1. Smt. Uma Devi Wife Of Late Shri Ramsharan Ji, Aged About 89 Years, Resident Of House No. 1928, Dusara Choraha, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazaar, Chowkdi Topkhanadesh, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Anil Son Of Late Shri Ramsharan Ji, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of House No. 1928, Dusara Choraha, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazaar, Chowkdi Topkhanadesh, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Ashok Alias Billu Son Of Late Shri Ramsharan Ji, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of House No. 1928, Dusara Choraha, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazaar, Chowkdi Topkhanadesh, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Deepak Son Of Late Shri Ramsharan Ji, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of House No. 1928, Dusara Choraha, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazaar, Chowkdi Topkhanadesh, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Satish Son Of Late Shri Ramsharan Ji, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of House No. 1928, Dusara Choraha, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazaar, Chowkdi Topkhanadesh, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Bharthari Lok Sewa Trust, Through So Called President Vinod Kumar So Called Adopted Son Babulal Vajpayee, Office At Back Side Of House No. 1928, Dusara Choraha, Khajanewalo Ka Rasta, Jaipur 2. Binod Kumar So Called Adopted Son Of Babulal Vajpayee, Address At House No. 1928 Back Side Of House No. 1928, Dusara Choraha, Khajanewalo Ka Rasta, Jaipur 3. Triveni Devi Wife Of Late Babulal Vajpayee, Resident Of Plot No. Special-1, Behind Apex Hospital, Pandit Ji Marble Factory Malviya Nagar Industrial Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ruchita Modi for Mr. Jitendra Mituka HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 13/05/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:19975] (2 of 2) [CW-6205/2025] 1. The present civil writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 10.02.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur in Civil Suit No.74/2012, whereby the application filed under Order 14 Rule 5 r/w Section 151 C.P.C. for framing of additional issues, was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent development in the matter, the writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. 3. Accordingly, the civil writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /17