Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8987 (MAD)

The Chairman v. N.Murugesan

CMP(MD)/11597/2025 · 2026-07-22

C V Karthikeyan, R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP.(MD)Nos.11597 & 11599 of 2025 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.18707 & 18708 of 2026 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J These petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 9 and 10 days respectively in filing the Writ Appeals against the order dated 27.10.2022 made in W.P(MD)Nos.9553 & 9554 of 2017. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, it is stated that owing to administrative reasons the delay had occurred. 3.Notice had been directed and notice was served. The learned counsel entered appearance for the respondent. 4.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and these petitions are allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeals if it are otherwise in order. When the matter is listed for admission, the name of the learned counsel, who appeared for the respondent, to be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J) gns 22.07.2026 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J gns CMP.(MD)Nos.11597 & 11599 of 2025 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.18707 & 18708 of 2026 22.07.2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis