Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8986 (RAJ)

ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI S/O SHRI RAM KUMAR TIWARI v. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/3362/2025 · 2025-03-10

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10750] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3362/2025 Ashok Kumar Tiwari S/o Shri Ram Kumar Tiwari, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of 658-1, 7Th Lane, Prem Nagar, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer-305001. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through Its Managing Director Having Its Office At Vidyut Bhawan, Makarwali Road, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer. 2. The Secretary (Admn.), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Makarwali Road, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer. 3. The Chairman Discoms, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arshad Khan for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/03/2025 1. At the outset, it has been apprised to this Court that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in the case of Surbhi Pareek Versus Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Others while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3062/2025 and batch of writ petitions vide order dated 06.03.2025. 2. Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the instant writ petition be decided in light of the similar observations made by this Court in the case of Surbhi Pareek (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:10750] (2 of 2) [CW-3362/2025] 3. Looking to the aforesaid arguments advanced by learned counsel for the respective parties, the instant writ petition stands dismissed in light of the similar observations made by this Court in the case of Surbhi Pareek (supra). 4. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/9