Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89849 (ALL)

SRI RAM GAUND v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WPIL/2724/2025 · 2025-09-10

J J Munir

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2724 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. The petitioner has come up with a prayer seeking a direction simplicitor to decide his representation dated 08.07.2025 addressed to the Sub Divisional Officer and the Tehsildar, Tehsil Hata, District Kushinagar. The grievance of the petitioner is regarding encroachment in Plot No. 247/0.1010 and Plot No. 267/0.1380 shown to be public utility land, by Santosh Singh s/o Kuber Singh, Radheshyam Singh s/o Seetaram Singh and Bhagwant Singh s/o Tribhuwan Singh. There is no substantive relief that the petitioner claims. In the absence of a substantive relief, it is not our province under Article 226 of the Constitution to favourably recommend the case of one litigant to the other. After all, the petitioner and the Sub Divisional Officer are both litigants before this Court. In the circumstances, we hold this petition for a mere direction to decide the petitioner's representation, to be not maintainable and dismiss the same as such. The petitioner will have liberty to move another writ petition on the same cause of action but for such substantive relief, as advised. September 11, 2025 Brijesh Maurya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamalesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (J.J. Munir,J.) Sri Ram Gaund .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad