APHC010099002020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6027/2020 Between: 1. S. SYEED MEER,, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O KHALEEL SAHEB, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. AMBEDKAR COLONY, AUTO NAGAR, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 0/O. DGP OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. PALEM SAI PRASAD, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,(V.R) 0/AT S.P. OFFICE, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHPURAM DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK BASHEER AHMED, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. SHAIK BASHU, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 16-82, UMA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT PIN- 515001. 6. NANDIPATTU SHEKHAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 50 YEARS, R/ O. 6TH LANE, AMBEDKAR COLONY, AUTO NAGAR, TIRUPATI. 7. SUBBA REDDY, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. NANDIBOTTU SHANKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. AMBEDKAR COLONY, 6TH LANE, AUTO NAGAR, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. S K RIYAZ, S/O. ALLAUDDIN, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.10-34, BALAKRISHNAPURAM, SETTIPALLE, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHETLURU SREENIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6027 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3, 4 and 7 in abusing their powers and calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any cake registered agaisnt the petitioner and thrateneing him to pay money and as well threatening to implicate me in false cases, as illegal, arbitrary and vilative of articles, 14, 19 and 21 and direct the respondent Nos.3, 4 and 7 not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law.…” 2. Heard Sri Ch. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station, in the absence of any crime registered and interfering with the civil disputes in between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station since no crime has been registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6027 of 2020 Dated.08.09.2025 TVN 145