Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143820 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29227 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Naushad,Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dinesh Kumar,Paritosh Sukla Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. Sri Rajiv Sisodia, counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the appellate authority has remanded the matter back to the revenue authorities for deciding the mutation case afresh. Aggrieved by the order passed by the appellate authority, a revision was preferred which was dismissed. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that still the matter under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration before the revenue authorities and a direction may be issued for deciding the same. 3. Sri Paritosh Shukla, counsel for the respondents does not dispute the proposal made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the said fact, the writ petition is disposed of requiring the respondent no.4 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Dhanaura, District Amroha to conclude the mutation proceedings strictly, in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties, within two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 CS/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad