Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89828 (ALL)

DR VINAY @ THAN SINGH v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/8692/2024 · 2025-09-08

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 8692 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This application has been filed for quashing of the cognizance order dated 07.06.2023 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act, Aligarh as well as charge sheet dated 09.06.2022 in ST. No. 2193 of 2023 arising out of case crime no. 31 of 2022, under sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and section 3(2)(5A) SC/ST Act, P.S. Pisawa, District Aligarh. On perusal of the record, the Court finds that the allegations made in the first information report disclose commission of a cognizable offence and those allegations have found support from the material collected during the course of investigation on the basis whereof the police has laid a charge sheet against the appellants.Therefore, prayer for quashing the chargesheet as well as cognizance order stand refused. At this stage, in case appellant appears before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the application is disposed off. September 9, 2025 RPD Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Krishna Kant Dubey, Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Dr Vinay @ Than Singh .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad