HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29634 of 2025 Court No. - 29 (Sl.No.27) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Kripa Shankar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri R.K.Jaiswal, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents not to interfere in peaceful possession of the petitioner over the house in question in Arazi No.262 area 6525 sq. ft., which is situated in Village Chauja Khas, Pargana Sadiyabad, Tehsil Jakhaniya, Distt. Ghazipur without providing adequate compensation and for a further direction to respondents to decide the objection of the petitioner dated 28.02.2025 within stipulated period. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4 informs the Court that at present no cause of action survives as the competent authority had already declared supplementary award on 27.08.2025 qua construction over Arazi No.262, which relates to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kripa Shankar Shukla, Ram Krishna Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal Shambhu Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Confronted with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that, at this stage, no cause of action survives and the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. However, he prays that leave may be accorded to the petitioner to agitate the quantum of compensation, if any, before the competent forum. 5. With the aforesaid leave, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) September 4, 2025 Ashish Pd. WRIC No. 29634 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad