HARYANA VANASAPATI AND GENERAL MILLS v. MS VANDANA KHURANA, EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER CUM ASSESSING AUTHORITY AND ANR
COCP/3974/2025 · 2025-08-25
Pankaj Jain
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89816 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89816 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(O&M)
102
Haryana Vanaspati & General Mills Kundi, Sonepat
...... Petitioner versus Ms. Vandana Khurana & anr.
..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :-
for the petitioner.
for the respondents. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order passed by the Writ Court stands complied with. 2
This fact is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. 3
No further order is required to be passed. 4
Rule discharged. 5
Contempt petition stands disposed off.
( PANKAJ JAIN ) 25.08.2025
JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2025.08.25 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document