Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010097302021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0EE 0^ 0 Ta TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST K TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE V PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5715 OF 2021 » H Between: Kutha Satyavathi, W/o. Atchi Reddy, Age 46 years, R/o D.No.49-26-66, Saikrupa Towers, Maduranagar, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Development Department, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Gambhiram Grampanchayath, Rep by it's Panchayath Secretary, Gambhiram Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly respondent 3 herein in attempting to dispossess the petitioner herein by high handily from the petitioner's property situated in an extent of A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi,
200 Sq.yards in old Sy.No.76,76B,77,75/2 now new Sy.No 175/4,5,6,7 of Gambiram village, Anandapuram mandalm, Visakhapatnam district, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, malafide against to the rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India particularly aricle 300A apart from violation of principles of natural justice and against to the settled principles of law and to consequently direct the respondents particularly respondent No.3 herein not dispossess the petitioner herein from the petitioner's property situated in an extent of 200Sq.yards in old Sy.No.76,766,77,75/2 now new Sy.No 175/4,5,6,7 of .Gambiram village, Anandapuram Mandalm, Visakhapatnam district without following due process of law. ( , lA NO:
1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent particularly respondent No.3 herein not interfere dispossess the petitioner herein from the petitioner's property situated in an extent of 200 Sq.yards in old Sy.No.76,766,77,75/2 now new Sy.No 175/4,5,6,7 of Gambiram village, Anandapuram mandalm, Visakhapatnam District. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Between:
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Development Department, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND
Kutha Satyavathi, W/o. Atchi Reddy, Age 46 years, R/o D.No.49-26-66, Saikrupa Towers, Maduranagar, Visakhapatnam. 1. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER The Gambhiram Grampanchayath, Rep by it's Panchayath Secretary, Gambhiram Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. (Respondent No.2 is not necessary party in this petition)
2. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 09.03.2021 in W.P.No.5715 of 2021 and also dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. S. C. BOSE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4;SRI Y.KOTESWARA RAO, SC FOR ZPP, MPP & GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the following order:
APHC010097302021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5715/2021 Between;
1.KUTHA SATYAVATHI, W/0 ATCHI REDDY, AGE 46 YEARS, R/0 D.NO 49-26-66, SAIKRUPA TOWERS, MADU RANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE A.P. SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3.THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.THE GAMBHIRAM GRAMPANCHAYATH, REP BY IT'S PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, GAMBHIRAM VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.ASCBOSE
2 Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel ForZilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra The Court made the following;
3 f
ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3, and the learned Standing Counsel for the 4^^ respondent. K This Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the 3^^ respondent in attempting to dispossess the petitioner herein by highhandedly from the petitioner’s property situated in an extent of 200 square yards in old Sy.No.76, 76-B, 77, 75/2, now the new Sy.No.175/4, 5, 6, 7 of Gambheeram Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, relying upon the counter filed by the 3'^'^ respondent, submits that the petitioner has purchased the plot in R.S.Nos.175/4, 175/5, 175/6, and 175/7 of Gambheeram Village through a registered document. However, the petitioner tried to construct a house in Sy.No.175/9 of Gambheeram Village, Anandapuram Mandal, which cannot be permitted as it is classified as 'Vagu' in the Revenue records and it is an objectionable Poramboke.
3.
4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, as per the counter filed by the 3^^ respondent, it is stated that they are not interfering with the purchased plots of the petitioner in R.S.Nos.175/4, 175/5, 175/6, and 175/7 of Gambheeram Village. However, the 3'^^ respondent has raised an objection to the petitioner’s attempt to construct a house in Sy.No.175/9, which is classified as ‘Vagu’ and it is an objectionable Poramboke. Hence, the
4 3'^^ respondent is entitled to protect the Vagu Poramboke in Sy.No.175/9 of Gambheeram Village, Anandapuram Mandal, and the petitioner shall not raise any construction in the said Vagu Poramboke area. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Interim
order, if deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. any. As a sequel. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /T' SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Development Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District.
3. The Mandal Revenue officer, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. The Panchayath Secretary Grampanchayath, Anandapuram mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
5. One CC to Sri A. S. C. Bose, Advocate [OPUC]
6. One CC to Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, SC for ZPP, MPP & Gram Panchayat[OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
8. Two CD Copies. Gambhiram Gambhiram Village ssb
HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025
ORDER WP NO. 5715 OF 2021 5 t i SFP 2025 ^ Currem aeciion m coh DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS