- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35955 WP No. 26186 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 26186 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: MR. RUDRAGOUDA SHIVASANGAPPAGOUDA PATIL S/O LATE S D PATIL, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOSPITAL ROAD, MUDDEBIHAL, BIJAPURA DISTRICT - 586 212 REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MR. D.N. RAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KEMPEGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA , BENGALURU DISTRICT 561 203. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35955 WP No. 26186 of 2023 4. THE TAHASILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562 114. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562 114. 6. TALUK SURVEYOR HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562 114. 7. MRS VIJAYALAKSHMI D/O LATE MUNISHAMI GOWDA, W/O LATE PALANIRAJU, MAJOR, RESIDENT OF 4TH CROSS R.R. JUNCTION, K.H. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. MANJUNATH, HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-6) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH / SETTING ASIDE THE ANNEXURE-A NOTICE DATED NIL BEARING NO. ISSUED BY THE R6- TALUK SURVEYOR, TO THE PETITIONER FOR CONDUCTING SURVEY, MEASUREMENT AND PHODI OF LAND BEARING SY. NO. 83 OF AMANIDODDAKERE VILLAGE, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT (LARGER PROPERTY) BASED ON THE ALLEGED APPLICATION FILED BY R7 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35955 WP No. 26186 of 2023 ORAL ORDER The matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. Even on the previous occasion, there was not representation. Consequently, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17