M/S SOFI CARPETS AND ANR. v. UT OF J AND K TH.ADDL DM BUDGAM(Banks)
WP(C)/2101/2024 · 2025-07-02
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 05 REGULAR LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP (C) 2130/2024 M/S SOFI CARPETS AND ANR …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
UT OF JK TH. ADDL DM BUDGAM ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Syed Ovais Geelani, Advocate for 2
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDE R 02.07.2025
In terms of order dated 27th September, 2024, read with order dated 28th October, 2024, the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 15 lacs by 15th November, 2024.
On the last date of hearing i.e. 23rd April, 2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders passed by this Court have not been complied with and the requisite amount has not been deposited.
In view of the aforesaid conduct of the petitioner, we are left with no option but to assume that the petitioner has not complied with orders of this Court, nor is he interested in pursuing this petition. It is for this reason that there has been absence on two consecutive dates of hearing.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 02.07.2025
“ARIF” Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 04.07.2025