SURESH KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. DISTRICT JUDGE KARWI CHITRAKOOT AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/1846/2025 · 2025-04-10
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8978 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8978 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:54172-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1846 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar Singh And Another Respondent :- District Judge Karwi Chitrakoot And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Srivastava,Sanjeev Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Mishra,Ashok Kumar Tiwari,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Heard Shri Sanjeev Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents and Shri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant.
2. Present writ petition is preferred inter-alia with following reliefs:-
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and quashing the impugned order dated 05.01.2025 passed by the Chairman, Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh/respondent no.2. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Assistant Registrar, Firms Society and Chits, Jhansi Division, Jhansi/respondent no.4 to conclude the proceedings in pursuance to the notice issued on 02.01.2025. (c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Chairman, Elders Committee, District Court Bar Association, Karwi, Chitrakoot/respondent no.5 not to administer oath of President and Secretary to the respondent no.6 and 7 respectively in pursuance to the certificate issued on 24.12.2024 and if administered, restrain them from functioning further."
3. After substantial argument, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that at this stage he confines his prayer that direction be issued to the Assistant Registrar, Firms Society and Chits Jhansi Division, Jhansi/respondent no.4 to conclude the proceedings in pursuance to the notice dated 02.01.2025.
4. Shri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have not objected the said prayer.
5. Be that as it may, the writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the proceeding is still pending consideration pursuant to notice dated 02.01.2025, it is expected that same may be decided expeditiously preferably within two months from the
date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving ample opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 11.4.2025 A. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad