MOHD RIZWAN ANSARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NAINITAL
C482/1245/2022 · 2025-02-27
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8977 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8977 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.1245 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
List revised.
2. There is no representation for the applicant.
3. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
4. Mr. Jai Prakash Pandey, Advocate for respondent no.2.
5. Today the matter is listed on an Urgency Application (IA No.1 of 2025).
6. It is contended by learned counsel for respondent no.2 that there is no interim order passed in favour of the applicant.
7. Thus in garb of this order the applicant are taking time before the trial court.
8. Accordingly, C482 application is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
27.02.2025 SK