Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89769 (PNJ)

SANDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8811/2025 · 2025-09-09

Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CRWP-8811-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 Sandeep Kumar and another ...Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. G.S. Jagpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. (Oral) Status report by way of an affidavit of Jasbinder Singh, PPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Industrial Area-A, Ludhiana has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and the same is taken on record. It has been submitted in the status report that during inquiry conducted on the application of petitioner No.1, apprehending danger from private respondents, statement of petitioner No.1 was recorded, who stated that regarding his grievance, FIR No.57 dated 26.03.2025, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, at Police Station Moti Nagar, Ludhiana has already been registered and that now the petitioners have no threat from the private respondents. Copy of said statement of petitioner No.1 signed by both the petitioners has also been appended with the status report. So, when the statements have already been suffered by the petitioners that now they have no apprehension from the private respondents, the present petition has become infructuous. KOMAL 2025.09.10 11:11 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRWP-8811-2025 (O&M) -2- Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 09.09.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.09.10 11:11 I attest to the accuracy of this document