BHAGWANT SINGH v. JOGINDER SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) AND ANR. THROUGH LRS.
CR/5118/2022 · 2025-08-18
Archana Puri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89763 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89763 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.145 CR-5118-2022 Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 BHAGWANT SINGH ....Petitioner Versus
JOGINDER SINGH THROUGH LRS & ANR
.....Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. J.S.Cooner, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Archana Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Pravindra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) At this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that since the main suit, qua which an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, was an offshoot, has been disposed of, he does not want to pursue with the revision petition and the same be dismissed as having become infructuous. Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) 18.08.2025 JUDGE Sonu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sonu 2025.08.19 09:56 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC