Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89763 (ALL)

RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13698/2025 · 2025-09-18

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13698 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has questioned the order of transfer dated 08.07.2025, whereby, the petitioner has been transferred. According to learned counsel for the petitioner as per the transfer policy, the employees who have remained posted for longer period should be first chosen while preparing the list for transfer. It is further submitted that in the last three years petitioner has been transferred five times, whereas, the similarly situated employees are remain posted there for quite long period. Per contra it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has a remedy of representation before the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shibli Naseem Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rakesh Kumar Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) authority to claim benefit of transfer policy and strict compliance thereof. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and having perused the records, I consider it appropriate for the petitioner to make fresh representation before the competent authority namely the respondent no. 3, who shall consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law and the transfer policy dated 06.05.2025. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that in the event petitioner makes a fresh representation against the transfer order before the respondent no. 3 within a period of two weeks from today along with the certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within a further period of six weeks. For a period of eight weeks or till the decision is taken by the authority, whichever is earlier, if the petitioner has not been relieved, he shall not be relieved. September 19, 2025 IrfanUddin WRIA No. 13698 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad