ANIL KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/28345/2024 · 2025-09-15
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89756 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89756 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28345 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Ambleshwar Pandey, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Prateek Dawar, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Chandra Shekhar Saran, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 4. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the effect and operation of the impugned summoning order dated 20.08.2018 passed by the court of A.C.J.M., Muzaffarnagar and entire proceedings of Case No.2100/9/2018 (State Vs. Anil Yadav and Others), arising out of Case Crime No.627 of 2017, under sections 406, 420, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Mansurpur, District Muzaffarnagar, on the basis of compromise. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned. He further submits that the certified copy of the compromise verification report is also on record as annexure No.S.A.-1 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devaang Savla, Prateek Dawar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anil Kumar Yadav And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
of the aforesaid case be quashed. 6. On the other hand, learned AGA for the State has no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 8.
In view of the aforesaid, the effect and operation of the impugned summoning order dated 20.08.2018 passed by the court of A.C.J.M., Muzaffarnagar and entire proceedings of Case No.2100/9/2018 (State Vs. Anil Yadav and Others), arising out of Case Crime No.627 of 2017, under sections 406, 420, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Mansurpur, District Muzaffarnagar, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 16, 2025 VKG A482 No. 28345 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad