CWP-23467-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 133 MALA SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the respondents to of the remaining 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondent stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, notice on behalf of the respondents notice, dated 10.03.2025 Secondary Education with law within 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: MALA SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to pay the amount of leave encashment of the remaining twenty-two days. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondent petitioner will be satisfied in case second pending legal notice, dated 10.03 specified period. Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, notice on behalf of the respondents/State and 10.03.2025, will be decided by the Education, by passing a speaking with law within a period of three months. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23467-2025 Date of Decision: 13.08.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate inter alia, seeking a writ of the amount of leave encashment petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this second respondent is directed to 10.03.2025, Annexure P-16, in a Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts and submits that the pending legal the second respondent/Director, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance seeking a writ of the amount of leave encashment submits that grievance raised s. At this is directed to , in a accepts legal Director, order in accordance Aman Dua 2025.08.18 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-23467-2025 5. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not p officer concerned shall pay costs of 13.08.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. assed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned counsel for the petitioner assed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.08.18 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document