[2025:JHHC:17440] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2965 of 2025 ------ Kanhu Kalament Tudu @ Kalament Kanhu Tudu, age about 51 years S/O- Late Ram Tudu, resident of Village Dhunda Pahari, P.O. & P.S.- Littipara, District- Pakur (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Yasir Arafat, Advocate Mr. Faruque Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-01-07-2025 I.A. No.5142 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing. Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2965 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Littipara P.S. Case No.89 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. Case No.40 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Section 341, 323, 420, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has cheated the informant by taking Rs.35,000/- to arrange a job for the two sons of the informant as a supervisor in Anganbari Center. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is no document to show the entrustment of money to the petitioner and the money given to him is not for any legal contract. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.01.2025 as is evident from para-10 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Pakur in connection with Littipara P.S. Case No.89 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. Case No.40 of 2020 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/