- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40225 WP No. 14681 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14681 OF 2023 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. M/S DAVANAGERE WADDING (A PARTNERSHIP FIRM) NO.1648/39, 3RD CROSS, SIDDAVEERAPPA LAYOUT DANAVAGERE - 577004 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER P S ASHA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT MS BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO 49, 4TH 7 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40225 WP No. 14681 of 2023 EXECUTIVE MEMBER. 3. ASSISTANT SECRETARY KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.49, 4TH 7 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 4. ASSISTANT SECRETARY KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD ZONAL OFFICE, KARUR INDUSTRIAL AREA PLOT NO CA(1-B), PB ROAD DAVANAGERE - 577006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED LETTER NO.KIADB/AS/DVG/1173/ 2022-23 DATED 16.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-E); DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO FIX THE RATE OF THE PLOT ALLOTTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AS PRESCRIBED IN THE ALLOTMENT LETTER AT ANNEXURE-B DATED 17-07-2009 BEARING NO.KIADB/AS/DVG/12545/748/2009-10 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40225 WP No. 14681 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This petition is listed for 5th time for non-compliance of the office objections. Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. By order dated 10.03.2025, this Court had granted a final opportunity of two weeks time to rectify the said objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner have no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-compliance with office objections. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15