[127] Sanjeev Kumar State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: SUBHAS MEHLA Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of to official private respondent petitioner. [2] petitioner may of judgment passed versus State of U.P.’, [3] 08.08.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8625 Date of Decision : Sanjeev Kumar versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Ms Malkit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of to official respondent Nos.1 to 5 to take respondent Nos.6 to 12 who are petitioner. No ground is made out for passing any petitioner may exhaust alternative legal remedies of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court versus State of U.P.’, (2008) 2 SCC 409. Disposed of. 08.08.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8625-2025 Date of Decision : 08.08.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents SUBHAS MEHLA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of directions to take an appropriate action against who are harassing and threatening the is made out for passing any direction. The remedies available to him, in view Supreme Court in ‘Sakiri Vasu (2008) 2 SCC 409. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under directions an appropriate action against and threatening the . The in view ri Vasu RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.11 19:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document