Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89727 (PNJ)

M/S ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/23464/2025 · 2025-08-13

Sanjiv Berry

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CWP No. 23464 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23464 of 2025 Date of decision: 13.08.2025 M/S ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED ….Petitioner V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY, JUDGE Present:- Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by petitioner-Bank aggrieved by non-execution of the order dated 28.06.2024 (Annexure P-3.) passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Patiala under the provisions of Section 14 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act for brevity). 2. It is rather surprising that concerned Nodal Officer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar, Patiala have failed to discharge their statutory duty of assisting and handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner-Bank. 2.1 Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) are a huge burden on the public exchequer, banking and financial system, and, thus, prompt enforcement of recovery mechanism under the SARFAESI Act is paramount for liquidity in the system. 3. In view of the above, this court by way of writ of mandamus directs concerned authorities to execute the order dated 28.06.2024 (Annexure P-3) passed under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act by handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner Bank as expeditiously as possible, KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.18 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP No. 23464 of 2025 preferably, within a period of 30 days. The petitioner bank, thereafter, can proceed to adopt all possible legitimate means to liquidate the secured asset to recover the due amount. 4. The petition for the time being stands disposed of in the terms aforesaid. Needless to say that the guidelines laid down by Coordinate Bench in Bank of Maharashtra Vs. District Magistrate, Hisar And Others (CWP-7018- 2022 decided on 28.05.2024) be adhered to by the concerned authorities. 5. We hasten to add that this order shall however be subject to any restraint/ interim/ final order which may have been passed by any judicial forum, in favour of the borrowers, who is party to this lis. 6. The present petition stands disposed of. 7. All pending Civil Miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 13.08.2025 Kamal Gandhi Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.18 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document