1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS & MRS. JAYASHREE KRISHNAMURTHY, MEMBER W.P. No.14606/2017 (Lok Adalat No.6833/2025) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIVENKATAPPA S/O LATE MASTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SMT. MANJULA W/O SAMPANGI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3. SMT. KAMALA D/O HULLURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 4. SRI CHINNAPPA S/O LATE DASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS 2 5. SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 6. SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 7. SMT. MUNIRATHNA W/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 8. SRI JAGADISH S/O CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 9. SMT. K.C. JAYALAKSHMI W/O MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 10. SMT. THIMMAKKA W/O CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAMBUSAVARI DHINNE, GOTTIGERE POST, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 083. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISHWANATH SHETTY.V, ADVOCATE) 3 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT 2 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 560009 3 . THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS DIRECTING THEM NOT TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOUSES CONSTRUCTED BY THE PETITIONERS IN 'A' TO 'K' SCHEDULE PROPERTIES TO THIS WRIT PETITION BY CONSIDERING THE DOCUMENTS OF THE PETITIONERS. 4 THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of writ of mandamus to the respondents directing them not to demolish the existing residential houses constructed by the petitioners in the petition schedule properties in Schedules-A to K by considering the documents of the petitioners. 2. In view of the registered sale deeds and the kathas registered in the office of the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike executed at the hands of respondent No.4-Tahsildar in respect of each of the petitioners, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition itself will be treated as a representation. 5 3. In view of the statement made by the learned Additional Government Advocate and learned Counsel for the petitioners submitting that the petitioners will be satisfied if such action is taken, the matter stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER rv/- CT:BHK