Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89714 (PNJ)

KHUSHPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8624/2025 · 2025-08-08

Subhas Mehla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[126] Khushpreet Kaur and another State of Punjab and Coram : Present: SUBHAS MEHLA [1] India is for issuance of protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents. [2] 97 years old and he has been tried to be shunt house. He submitted that a detailed representation (Annexure P already been filed before the police authorities but till date no action has been taken on the same. [3] [4] behalf of the respondent by the petitioners shall be decided with law. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8624 Date of Decision : Khushpreet Kaur and another versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Ms. Malkit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of appropriate direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that petitioner No.2 is 97 years old and he has been tried to be shunt house. He submitted that a detailed representation (Annexure P already been filed before the police authorities but till date no action has been taken on the same. Notice of motion. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A. behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the representation submitted by the petitioners shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8624-2025 Date of Decision : 08.08.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents SUBHAS MEHLA Advocate for the petitioners. Prayer in the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of appropriate direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that petitioner No.2 is 97 years old and he has been tried to be shunted out from his residential house. He submitted that a detailed representation (Annexure P-5) has already been filed before the police authorities but till date no action has Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on State and submits that the representation submitted by the competent authority in accordance Prayer in the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of appropriate direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that petitioner No.2 is ed out from his residential 5) has already been filed before the police authorities but till date no action has G., Punjab, accepts notice on State and submits that the representation submitted by the competent authority in accordance RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.12 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8624-2025 -2- [5] Heard. [6] The statement made by learned State Counsel satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioners. [7] In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to competent authority to consider and decide the representation expeditiously, in accordance with law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 08.08.2025 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.12 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document